Page 22 - Insurance Times August 2018
P. 22

PIONEERING
INSURANCE
PROTECTION
FOR AN
AUTONOMOUS
WORLD

I s society ready for living in an autonomous world?              of technology has been so pervasive that, in 2017, the North
       Ready or not, it's here. In fact, it's been with us for a  American Industry Classification System (NAICS) updated the
       while. The better question for those of us in the          industry classifications to incorporate the impact of industries
       insurance industry to ask is whether we're ready for       engaged in the production of advanced technologies. So not
it. While society is getting acquainted with the advantages       'new'; just new to us.
and the risks of piloting and adopting autonomy and its
implications, we need to be ready to address the risks and        Shifts and challenges
liabilities associated with it.
                                                                  There's no question that our clients are pioneering the use
As with all technological advances, before products and           of advanced technologies such as robotics and autonomous
services hit the consumer market, they operate in some            machines. But there's no denying that it presents a shift in
capacity in industry. The same is true with autonomous            liability and a challenge to our legal systems, which have
machines, artificial intelligence and robotic technology,         historically focused on causation - what caused a third party
which is already in play to varying degrees in logistics,         injury, business interruption, etc., to occur and who is
construction, agriculture, professional services,                 responsible.
manufacturing transportation-and of course the most widely
talked about, self-driving vehicles. The rapid advancement        Until recent times, machines have typically been built for a
                                                                  specific reason with a defined deliverable - a tool for a person
                     About the author                             to use. The machine was a "dumb machine" that could not
                                                                  learn from itself or from other machines. It had no level of
                   Nancy Bewlay                                   personal accountability because it was incapable of any type
                                                                  of autonomous action. When there was a defect, it could
                      Global Chief Underwriting Officer,          generally be tracked back to either defective programming
                      Casualty, XL Catlin                         or incorrect operation of the machine. This allowed for an

22 The Insurance Times, August 2018
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27